Posterous
Trey is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Dsc02016_thumb
 
soul - ache  - ideas, sounds and images between the already and the not-yet

on sentencing zacchaeus


Back in January we were just coming out of Advent and starting a new cycle of Sunday School material in our youth department. Being that it was new curriculum, I asked our high school teacher what he thought about the days lesson. With genuine enthusiasm, he said "Well, it's Zacchaeus today, so I'm starting by talking about Bernie Madoff and the way people are treating him."

I felt like my ministry sensibilities had failed me. Somehow, in between tearful interviews with those defrauded by Madoff and the perpetual loop of a silver-haired man in a Yankees cap being dogged by reporters, I had missed the simple comparison.

Six months later we sit on the Great Day of Judgment--Madoff's attorney is hoping/begging/pleading for a 12 year sentence while those he defrauded are asking for the full 150 years stemming from 11 different counts of fraud and money laundering.

No one can argue the vile nature of such a carefully concocted scheme. It violates all assumptions of business ethics, even in the occasionally gray world of investment banking. There is no doubt about it, Madoff has legally "earned" everything he will undoubtedly get--and yet the ghost of Zacchaeus lingers in the background.

One victim of Madoff's scheme has been quoted as saying "We seek neither mercy nor sympathy."
It's hard to argue with the pain of another human being, but Jesus' treatment of the allegedly wee little man speaks a cautionary word against such sentiments.

"Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost."

Madoff has, not surprisingly, cut off all radio contact. He's not issuing any apologies (not yet, anyway) nor is he clamoring up Central Park trees in search of salvation--but what if he were?

Jailhouse conversions draw sneers from even the most pious "believers". Many regard such transformations as inherently disingenuous, and yet we follow one who pardons tax collectors and Ponzi schemers. The scandal of grace is that it always cuts both ways, at least when Jesus has anything to do with it.

Whether or not there are any signs of genuine remorse, only time will tell. I'm not holding my breath expecting Madoff to repay four times what he has stolen, but I do wonder what our sense of "justice" says about the grace we have (or haven't) received.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bernie madoff   grace   jesus   zacchaeus  
Posted June 29, 2009
// 0 Comments

on the selling of indulgences and venture capitalists

What do you call a 16th century spinning nail gun? Martin Luther rolling over in his grave.


At least I think that's what's happening, and, given the New York Times article declaring that indulgences are back, I imagine he's peppered the inside of that coffin with way more than 95 Theses.

It's hard for me to even begin to process commodifying grace, but, in the interest of giving my Catholic brethren and sistern the benefit of the doubt, I'm really trying to wrap my brain around this. Promise.

I've spent some time trying to understand the psychology of "free stuff." Just last week I overheard our church ministry assistant telling someone that Weight Watchers has to charge a fee for their service because "if it doesn't cost you something then you don't value it enough to take it seriously."

By some cursory web searches that hardly qualify as research, it seems that psychologists and marketing folks are split about this. If you give someone something for free they may, in fact, abuse it--thinking that the well will never run dry. Conversely, others may treasure it as sheer gift, and, out of extreme gratitude, only use that one good/service above all others.

Then there's the question of the brain's own approach to things. In the choice between a "best" that costs and a "free" that's good enough, many folks will be happy to use the free version as long as it meets their needs.

It turns out Venture Capitalists in the tech sector have figured this out and have deemed this concept "freemium" . The guiding principle is that if a person becomes accustomed to using a service (with or without ads), they will eventually value the service and, as features are added at a cost, some members will be willing to pay a premium for the services they want, either motivated by guilt or perceived necessity.

I think the VC's out there and the Holy See may be drawing cards from the same trick deck. Both services rely on creating a sense of need within the consumer, giving them something for free,  then seeing whose willing to dole it out incrementally or (for the low, low price of $___.__) attempt to satiate that need instantly.

And when I'm honest, the Protestants like me, heirs to Luther's legacy, aren't much better. Truth be told I'm not sure but what the compliment to this post isn't the one I wrote about innocence a couple of days ago.

We crave absolution--some form of reciprocity. "Free" sounds cheap, and so we rationalize that we will abuse and misuse it--the thought alone the end result of our cynicism. It is our unwillingness to trust ourselves to do the right thing with the grace we have been shown--to give it back, measure for measure, to all who cross our path. Brennan Manning rightly reminds us "Never confuse your perception of yourself with the mystery that you really are accepted."

May we cease striving, cease spending, cease searching for the everlasting absolution only to find it was, and has always been, 
free.

She Must And Shall Go Free by Derek Webb  
(download)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   derek webb   free   freemium   grace   indulgences   martin luther   roman catholic church   venture capitalists  
Posted February 11, 2009
// 0 Comments

living in the tension

 Paul is big on grace, but contextually, he's big on grace because the early church was still a movement rooted in Judaism, which was all about process and observance--keeping the Law above all else.

Most of our "salvation language" and sermons come from Paul, specifically from Romans, which is where Paul speaks in a lot of the terms you/I/the whole "church-y" world use--condemned, sinned, transgressed, separated, etc. That vocabulary was, initially, in Paul's context, rhetoric to articulate the idea that under the Law, ALL are condemned. People disagreed with Paul--they said they'd never committed adultery, but Paul then deferred to Jesus--"If any man looks at a woman lustfully" and Paul says that 50% of the world's population EVER just got condemned by the Savior himself. Paul's point is that Law will kill you, but grace gives you life.

As Baptists in the South we've got about 180 years worth of tradition that tells us how we're supposed to work this thing out. We pray prayers, ask Jesus to indwell us (as if that hasn't been happening since He made us in His image), walk aisles, take a bath of some spiritual significance, then measure our fidelity to Jesus in how often we come to church, whether we serve on committees, teach Sunday School, tithe, etc.

You can get really close to Jesus this way, and you can learn a lot about God--it's not all bad. But it is a transactional system that finds it's roots in specific passages of Scripture, generally stripped out of context.

We stand condemned to...something...hell, lake of fire, trash-heap (there's not one consistent image of separation from God in the New Testament)

Jesus comes in in super-hero fashion and rescues us from that lake of fire and nasty thing into eternity, which is really white and presumably will be occupied with shiny things and lots of singing.

And people dream about that once or twice a week when they're not paying their taxes, working the 9 to 5, mowing the lawn or watching football.


 Ecclesiastes says "God put eternity in the hearts of men." 

We were meant to live with an ache
--an inconsolable longing that there has to me something more-- more right, more beautiful.

But we get glimpses of it when we're part of bringing the kind of Kingdom Jesus talked about. When we tend to widow, the poor, the marginalized, the oppressed--when we move out of the steepled buildings and into the streets, we see the wildness and the broadness of God's kingdom.

It becomes less of a social club and more of a party--more like some great surprise party where you hang the streamers and get all excited until the person breaks through the door. 

And that's what we work and wait for--because God put eternity in the hearts of mankind.

Years ago I taught a Bible Study when I worked at Ridgecrest called the Pursuit of Holiness. It was the single most frustrating thing I've ever done. 

Because the more your pursue holiness, the less holy you feel. 

Because our vision of God should always get bigger, never smaller.

We feel the small-ness. We feel the un-holyness of it all.

And the pages of Scripture are filled with the full spectrum of people who felt it all--the overwhelming tide of grace and the gut-wrenching rock-crashing of our own weaknesses and vice.

And against the noise of our own soul's songs of lamentation God whispers love to our hearts.

Because love always, always wins.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   ache   church-y language   grace   love wins   paradox  
Posted November 14, 2008
// 3 Comments