Posterous
Trey is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Dsc02016_thumb
 
soul - ache  - ideas, sounds and images between the already and the not-yet

on contracts and the swearing of oaths


In honor of Jen and I's love of musical theater (and last night's Tonys) I thought I'd take some time here to reflect on going to see Jersey Boys at the Fox Theater last week. If you're not a theater nerd, well, hang with me--I'm still going somewhere, I swear.

"My hand to God..."
Truth be told, Jersey Boys is well out of the gate by now. By the time most musicals make it to Atlanta, they've collected their requisite Tony's and Drama Desk awards, and most often the actors garnering such prestige have long since moved onto other projects. Still, Jen and I hadn't seen Jersey Boys and were excited, despite being decidedly younger than the generation that first knew the hits of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons.

The show was great--sort of a juke-box musical ala Mamma Mia! in the way that it showcased the music of Frankie and the Four Seasons, but biographical in nature and theme. There was a sense of story that sucked in my generation who will occasionally confessed to getting sucked into every VH1 Behind the Music special, or, on particularly rainy, sleepy weekends, an E! True Hollywood Story marathon. Jersey Boys met and exceeded all expectations as it told the fascinating story of Frankie, Bob, Tom, and Nick (and every other iteration in between).

But easily the most pervasive theme/catchphrase (that didn't include all kinds of colorful "Jersey language") was when Tommy DeVito, the small-town fixer/mob boss/musician, would recite various details of the early life and times of he and Frankie's relationship. Almost without fail, Tommy would conclude each soliloquy with a raised right hand and the simple phrase "My hand to God..."

It was a punchline--a smooth-line from a smooth operator who had never kept any word, regardless of his hand position. There's a certain amount of heart to Tommy, but a basic ruthlessness that is equal parts greed and machismo. 

Without giving away the entire plot of the thing, suffice it to say that eventually another member of the band is added, Bob Gaudio, a piano man-songwriter. By the end of Act I, Bob and Frankie have worked out a side-deal. When Bob starts to draw up an official contract for the partnership, Frankie interrupts him and says "We make a Jersey contract." offering only a handshake and his word.

"Let your yes be yes..."
I don't even think by brain hesitated when it hyper-linked to the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount 

"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.' But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God's throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.

People swore oaths all the time--it was the only way to seal a deal. Even Yahweh's covenant with Abram is sealed by a ritual ans swearing of an oath.

Frankie's promised hand to Bob was as tight of a contract as any sworn statement before a court official, but largely because each party agreed to participate in it...which got me thinking...

"...We're just skeptical about it's worth--of it being the the only thing." 
I had read earlier in the week that the latest class of Harvard Business School had initiated a sort of Hippocratic Oath for Corporate America. The "MBA Oath" as it has come to be known pledges ethical decision making in business that prevents the willful deception, use and abuse of individuals and funds for willful and deliberate gain. Some have called it a sort of "anti-Madoff clause", but that's scapegoating a bit (Madoff got all his moves from Zaccheus, after all).

What was perhaps most compelling about the interview were the two students interviewed. They were quite explicit about their belief that the business world is and should remain explicitly "for profit". What they rejected, however, was the now infamous me-generation credo of Gordon Gecko in Wall Street that "Greed is good." In the words of one student "I don't want to be 75 and look back...and realize I've left all these people in my wake along the way." only to hear the quick caveat of his colleague declaring they are "for profit......We're just skeptical about it's worth--of it being the the only thing."

Sowing Wild Oaths...
Maybe it's the randomness of the idea--from the stage, to the Sermon on the Mount, to the speaker of my car on a Sunday morning, but I'd like to think there's a pattern here.

What I find most interesting is that these business school graduates are swearing an oath--their "yes" has been returned "insufficicent funds because of words like Ponzi, AIG and executive exuberance. They have to swear an oath to their customers, their colleagues--their fellow humanity--that they will carry out their business with a sense of purpose--that "business ethics" are not irreconcilable. 

Maybe their onto something or maybe their just getting back to Frankie and Bob. The question that lingers in my mind is what is our oath as a consumer?

If Bob broke the "Jersey contract" then Frankie would no longer be bound by it, and vice versa.

Inasmuch as those we entrust with our finances are swearing to behave responsibly, I have to wonder...what's my consumer responsibility? Where do I sign and what exactly should I be signing on for? How, in the words of Gandhi, do I begin to differentiate between what is enough for everyone's need, and yet insufficient for my own greed?

Maybe I should settle for a handshake.

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bob gaudio   contracts   frankie valli   jersey boys   jesus   MBA oath   NPR   sermon on the mount  
Posted June 8, 2009
// 0 Comments

on home and heaven



I've been thinking a lot lately about heaven. That's probably not normal for the average 30-year old. Word on the street if that most people don't go there until, well, they're getting close to going there. 


Like most concepts, heaven is an idea(l) still very much under construction, inasmuch my own sense of faith and pilgrimage are. What I continue to find is that at each point in the trail there is a mass-media explosion of song and verse, images and visions. Even trying to put it all together in these few words on a screen seems doomed. Still, it's only fair to try and trace this idea and whether or not we're going there, it's coming here or how we'll know the difference.

I'll Fly Away: 
The Theme Park Heaven
I was at a conference last week where the speaker was telling a story where a colleague was bemoaning the way in which the Church's songs betray its' own theology. His object of attack in this case was a sort of hee-haw rendition of I'll Fly Away. After lampooning the song, the professor went on to say that visions of a heaven that's "out there", beyond what we can see or experience, natively shift our perspective from the suffering in our midst, to the point of giving us a way out. His point was that we can become disengaged from the suffering around us.

Fortunately, one bright student pushed back a bit and asked the professor where that song came from. The professor gruffly muttered "some sort of spiritual, I don't know..." (it was actually written in 1929 by Albert Brumley, a white cotton-farmer from Oklahoma as a "gospel song"). The student pushed further.

"I understand what you're saying, but that song and more like it were instrumental during the civil rights movement. Many of them took their sentiment from earlier spirituals. When you're being tortured and oppressed, hearing that heaven is just like earth isn't a message of hope--in fact, it sounds a lot like hell."

Truth be told, while I'm not a fan of the way in which the professor mocked I'll Fly Away, I get where he was trying to go. He was reacting against something that had nothing to do with the civil rights movement and liberation. I was raised in a suburban home outside Atlanta, so rural country churches were not my experience, but many of them had informed and nurtured the faith of many members of our congregation. 

Their spirits soared anytime the Music Minister dared to pull out "Will the Circle Be Unbroken?",  "When the Roll is Called Up Yonder" or "Beulahland", a song my father-in-law has sung at more funerals of these good folks then he could count.

But it wasn't just the songs. The songs were a sort of soundtrack to a divine, as-yet-unseen glistening city, with gates of pearl, streets of gold and crystal clear rivers and streams. I remember hearing one evangelist detail exactly what each "mansion in glory" would look like while still another used the visions of Ezekiel and Revelation to draw a heavenly blueprint.

To my child-like brain the closest thing to a gold road was the yellow-brick road in The Wizard of Oz which worked, by and large because it appealed to those most basic flights of fantasy. I couldn't imagine what I would see and do, but it sounded like an incredible theme park of mansions and buildings, a new attraction around every corner. 

It sounded like Six Flags but better.

And when your 8, 9, 10, 11 years old, what kid doesn't want to go to Six Flags?

Heaven is a Place on Earth:
The Front Porch Heaven

The promise of mansions and gold may have been enough motivation for an 11-year old to walk an aisle, but they're not enough to force allegiance to an idea. This happens all the time. We get a desire for a certain item, we work for it, and as we get closer to attaining it something else catches our attention. The original item isn't good enough anymore, and we begin to question why we ever wanted that in the first place.

For many people this is the place where they "lose" faith, though it's debatable whether or not faith was ever part of a picture--aisles for conversion, prayers for golden tickets--there's an implicit risk of making a transaction, not a commitment. While most of my adolescence was spent in prophets of Baal-like blood-letting to show my commitment, I eventually found that the scandal of grace didn't require sacrifice, just an acknowledgment of mercy.

This remains the most spiritually significant epiphany of my faith-journey to date. Running headlong into grace and then kicking against it, begging for ways to prove your worth is exhausting, and that's something of the point. When you tire of kicking and screaming and fighting, there's always only the embrace of a loving Creator. Eventually, we rest in that.

The danger of this end is that it feels so liberating, so comforting, so life-giving that we lose a bit of our imagination. One of the triggers for this article was an interview I heard a few weeks ago on NPR . The Irish actor Gabriel Byrne was being interviewed and asked about a good many things, including his time growing up in Ireland, as well as entering (and subsequently leaving) seminary. When he managed convey that his home life was in some way lacking, the interviewer pressed. After a brief pause, the wizened actor mused "I think when most people think about heaven, what they are really thinking about is an idealized version of home."

I spent the better part of an 80-minute commute thinking about those words. I recalled sitting at my grandmother's house, crying like mad, longing to go back to my own home and sleep in my own bed. She would hold me and rock and softly sing "In the Sweet By-and-By." I can't hear that song to this day without thinking of her.

More specifically, I can't hear that song without thinking that that was, in that very moment, heaven. Unconditional love and acceptance wrapped up in a grandmother's embrace.

And that's when I thought Gabriel Byrne was onto something.

Hunger for the Great Light:
The "Not-Yet" Heaven

When I'm honest, the notion of heaven being like lying in my grandmother's arms is still appealing. That image has not left me and I still find a great deal of truth in it. 

The problem is somewhere in the embrace of God I thought "Everyone should know and understand this!" And somewhere along the line all that well-intentioned zeal became the ardent belief (which I still maintain) that as people who have been redeemed we are to take an active role in the work of redemption.

To this day I find myself fascinated by "re" words--renewal, restoration, reconciliation, revolution, restarting, rebuilding, reusing, reducing...the list goes on forever.

In fact, this idea is so heavily ingrained in me at this very minute that I feel myself giving way to it--to the belief that we could get there--or at very least get a glimpse--of what the kingdom (of God, of heaven) could actually look like.

Add to this mix a providential "shuffle" of the old iPod while still weighing the words of Gabriel Byrne that yielded the following song.

The Pearl by Emmylou Harris  
(download)


There's a longing in Emmylou Harris' voice that is utterly transcendent. It speaks to something known only in glimpses and in dreams--a certain hopeful wistfulness that points to something still beyond, still greater.

I was soaking in the goodness of the song when I found my lips uttering the very words that challenged my musings on heaven and home. 

We drink our fill and still we thirst for more
Asking if there's no heaven what is this hunger for?

There's still an ache in us. Despite our best efforts at doing the work of redemption, what we see in those most sacred moments are only a taste of what someday will be.

And a few years ago, I think I would've cursed that. I would wonder why we have to toil--why do we have to work so hard in such a painful, broken world--particularly if we'll never get there.

But if we could do it--if we could actually get there--what would we do then? 

Where would the drive and the ambition, the relentlessness of a heart weighed down by injustice--where would it go?

Ecclesiastes says simply "God has placed eternity in the hearts of humanity."

Our sense of longing...of hunger...of thirst...these things are all tied to the eternity locked up in our hearts.

They are the very thing that push us to dream of another world.

They are the visions that tell our soul that it's actually possible.

They are the foolish things that shame our self-preserving "wisdom".

They are the things that push us forward--toward something greater and bigger and more true.

They are the driving force that makes the "re" possible.

They are the power that rose Jesus from the grave.

They are the grace that wrecks our lives and holds us while we rage against it.

They are the forces that call us heavenward in Christ Jesus.

They are the dreams of the Kingdom and

they 

are

ours.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   emmylou harris   gabriel byrne   heaven   home   NPR  
Posted May 29, 2009
// 1 Comment

on a critical culture (or politics, american idol and the NFL draft)

Over the last few days I feel like I've noticed a bit of a trend. Maybe it's think through the whole issue of American entitlement, but I feel like there's a common theme that's creeping into my consciousness by all manner of media and information.


I first noticed it last week as various sports-talk hosts were debating the merits of any number of collegiate athletes preparing for the NFL draft last Saturday. At that specific time, the ongoing conversation surrounded Matthew Stafford, the overall number one pick and former university of Georgia quarterback. One host was delineating Stafford's weaknesses--occasionally poor decision making, forcing decisions, particularly under pressure. The other host responded with a litany of Stafford's successes and ended with "Everybody's a critic."

In all fairness, the hosts were just as likely "playing radio" as they could even actually believe and hold such positions, but the last phrase stuck with me.

Flash-forward to last night, as Jen and I made our Tuesday night ritual (with 30 million of our closest friends) of watching American Idol. I catch myself evaluating and critiquing every performance, most often agreeing with Simon and dismissing the other judges opinions as predictable pablum--worn adages masquerading as genuine critique. I confess I always get a little excited when Simon's evaluations (or the rare glimpse of original feedback from Randy or Kara) happens to echo something I had said or thought during the actual performance.

Clearly, I have a bias here (Adam Lambert is the lost love-child of Freddie Mercury and David Bowie and the most talented contestant ever on the show). That bias prevents me from offering genuine critique, and my lack of training/education/general involvement in any aspect of the music industry renders my opinion only as good as that of the other 30 million couch critics partaking in same said ritual.

Then I log-on to CNN and the New York Times today and splattered across the page(s) in manifold headlines is the same numbered phrase--"100 days". A soundbite from NPR earlier in the weak braced me for this, as the presidential historian being interviewed said the traditional indicator of Presidential success (which I think should be called "Executive Groundhog Day" or something similar) goes back to FDR's first 100 days during which the political groundwork of the New Deal was laid. The historian said Roosevelt both created and forever broke the mold for what could be accomplished in such a time.

So the Times and CNN have pundits from across the board weighing in with their letter grades on President no-longer-elect Obama, which vary from A's to F's to "a high incomplete". CNN has even tipped their hat to the user-generated revolution by featuring in the "headlines" on the main page an "iReport" opinion from "a GOP college student." I didn't find that a compelling source, so I can't tell you what grade said collegiate levied upon the present administration, but I fancy it was somewhere between a grim harbinger of things to come or something that might come out of a Magic 8-ball ("Outlook not so good" or "Reply hazy, try again.")

What I realized in the middle of all the bombardment of opinion and critique is that our culture seems to value the ability to be critical. In fairness, I'm chief offender here--there's very few things I can think of that I didn't/don't have an opinion on after (some) listening.

But I wonder where that kind of spirit gets us. 

On vacation last week I caught myself measuring and ranking restaurants by imaginary criteria-- 

"Best view, decent shrimp." or "Great value, decent service."


All restaurants are not created equal, and I found my opinion of the food or service had little to no impact on Gabe's opinion (he favored the beachfront one where the waiters danced with him, even though it was overpriced).

And there I go again. The problem is, when I'm really honest, a culture that lauds criticism can only result in a sense that there's always something better around the corner.

The internet sensation of yester-week that was Susan Boyle --a dowdy Scottish cat-lady who wowed Simon Cowell on "Britain's Got Talent" with a West-end headliner voice--was quickly and sharply replaced two days later with a comparable headline "Young Stevie Wonder" steals spotlight from Susan Boyle on CNN.

A critical culture yields less than fifteen minutes of fame--it's always reminding us it's 14:59 and counting.

I think somewhere in the midst of that I lose the ability to savor the present. 

In the march for the next great band, performance, Lost episode, Grey's Anatomy episode, church event, mission trip, spiritual high...even *sigh* the next vacation...

In the act of critiquing what is for what could or should be, I risk missing the sacrament of what is.

And that loss is always, only, mine.




Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   american idol   criticism   media   NFL draft   NPR   president obama  
Posted April 29, 2009
// 1 Comment

on economics and faith

I am not an economist, nor am I the son of an economist. I am an outsider to the financial world who hears terms like "bail-out", "Ponzi scheme" and 'Keynesian economics" and runs to the internet like fifth-graders looking at the dioramas at a Natural History museum. I also confess a general disdain for operations that are inherently mathematical in nature. Algebraic functions work fine, but you go into calculus or geometrical charts and I'm screwed. 


Inasmuch as I don't understand these things, I find my greatest intolerance is ignorance--first in others and secondarily (as I am made aware of it) within myself. So I am trying to make sense of some of this, and I'm fumbling through it. More specifically, I'm trying to figure out how faith plays into the whole thing--to say Jesus was a socialist or capitalist is to, in a very real sense, miss the point and risk a false dilemma. Jesus was, and is, infinitely more than either of these things, but it is much more difficult to make direct application to our current crisis.

Last Friday NPR ran a piece jointly produced with This American Life  that introduced me to the ribald figure of John Maynard Keynes--a British economist from the earlier 20th century. It turns out that Keynes disliked Americans intensely and speculated that the illegitimate child of the British Empire wasn't smart enough to implement his economic system. Much could be said about Keynesianism and what I learned from that radio segment, but for all intents and purposes, the principle is relatively simple: 
  • The simplest way to stimulate the economy is through investing government funds into the economy directly. This way jobs are created, infrastructure is strengthened/created and the financial system is stabilized.
In the 1980's most economists rejected Keynes and saw interest rates as a stabilizing force in the economy. The competing ideal was that consumer spending was the sign of economic confidence. As confidence went down, the interest rate could be rolled back by the Federal Reserve and people would/could borrow more with less interest--which works, at least until the rate is absolute 0--which it hit in mid-December of last year.

Keynes is suddenly once again en vogue as evidenced in the President's speech at the Democratic National Convention last August:
 ...give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else.  In Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really means is - you're on your own.  Out of work?  Tough luck.  No health care?  The market will fix it.  Born into poverty?  Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps - even if you don't have boots.  You're on your own.

Many have (and will) dismiss the now-President-then-candidate Obama's words as pablum or political soapboxing to rally the Democratic base--but what if we dispelled our cynicism for a minute?

This morning one of the featured headlines on CNN.com read "What GOP Leaders Deem Wasteful in Senate Stimulus Bill:". I clicked the link with what I thought were pretty good expectations of what I would find--cuts to education, technology, infrastructure repair, new energy and health-care initiatives. I was shocked at the extent of the proposed "revisions." Lest I be accused of piece-mealing it, here's the list in it's entirety:


• $2 billion earmark to re-start FutureGen, a near-zero emissions coal power plant in Illinois that the Department of Energy defunded last year because it said the project was inefficient.
• A $246 million tax break for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film.
• $650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program.
• $88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship).
• $448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security headquarters.
• $248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters.
• $600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees.
• $400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent STD's.
• $1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs.
• $125 million for the Washington sewer system.
• $150 million for Smithsonian museum facilities.
• $1 billion for the 2010 Census, which has a projected cost overrun of $3 billion.
• $75 million for "smoking cessation activities."
• $200 million for public computer centers at community colleges.
• $75 million for salaries of employees at the FBI.
• $25 million for tribal alcohol and substance abuse reduction.
• $500 million for flood reduction projects on the Mississippi River.
• $10 million to inspect canals in urban areas.
• $6 billion to turn federal buildings into "green" buildings.
• $500 million for state and local fire stations.
• $650 million for wildland fire management on forest service lands.
• $1.2 billion for "youth activities," including youth summer job programs.
• $88 million for renovating the headquarters of the Public Health Service.
• $412 million for CDC buildings and property.
• $500 million for building and repairing National Institutes of Health facilities in Bethesda, Maryland.
• $160 million for "paid volunteers" at the Corporation for National and Community Service.
• $5.5 million for "energy efficiency initiatives" at the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration.
• $850 million for Amtrak.
• $100 million for reducing the hazard of lead-based paint.
• $75 million to construct a "security training" facility for State Department Security officers when they can be trained at existing facilities of other agencies.
• $110 million to the Farm Service Agency to upgrade computer systems.
• $200 million in funding for the lease of alternative energy vehicles for use on military installations.

It's tempting to go line by line and discuss how legitimate or heinous each of these cuts are (even more so to think that many of these are actually viewed by someone as "pork"). I'll try to fight that temptation for now, but the alternative suggestion from the GOP are increased tax breaks for the American consumer. I think there are myriad flaws with this plan, but again, I'm no economist.

I am, however, a person of faith--more specifically, a minister--someone who is supposed to model faith, question faith, and be able to talk to others about issues related to faith. I've been at a bit of a loss in our current economic crisis--I don't know what to tell the worker who was just laid-off and what little I do know seems cheap and trite--like well-intentioned cliches at a funeral.

What I can say is that I know what we've been called to, and, by negation, what we've been called away from. Walter Brueggemann, a noted scholar of the Old Testament (or "Hebrew Bible" as it is more aptly known), has written brilliantly to this end. I stumbled upon the article from another blog that quoted him and as much as the writer inside me says "Don't quote the same section!", I cannot help myself. 

Brueggemann says: 
It is futile, from a biblical perspective, to engage in disputes about modern theoretical labels such as "socialism" or "capitalism." The Bible does not linger over such labels, but insists that every available instrument of well-being—government, charity, private sector—must be mobilized in order to mediate the resources of the community for the sake of the common good.

We have been called to mobilize forces for the building of the Kingdom. 

A Kingdom does not consist of vigilante cowboys, furiously clamoring for bootstraps only to realize they were repossessed by Wall Street.

A Kingdom does not consist of "Me generation" yuppies (or later iterations) vituperatively arguing for individualism and autonomy.

A Kingdom cannot stand while it's citizens hoard material goods and reject the King's claim to limitless bounty.

A Kingdom cannot stand when it has exchanged promise for credit.

I recognize these are generalizations and I am not without sin here. What I feel in the crisis of this day--what I want to believe we all feel--is a sense of loss with every layoff. That we are grieving with those known and unknown who are struggling to see hope and purpose in the midst of pain. And it is in the middle of that community that we catch a glimpse of the eternity born in our hearts--that we are more than a nation or even a civilization--that we are citizens of yet another Kingdom that calls us to live out those principles within our current land.

Before God and in the example of Christ, we are to live out a faith that considers neighbor over kin, need above greed and everyone over self. 

When we do so we cease to glamorize rugged individualism as we move in step with the Spirit as the Beloved Community.

When we care for one another more than we care for ourselves we find riches that cannot be measured in currency or in goods--where tides of love meet welcome shores of gratitude.

We appeal to our government to do the job that the Church has not--to care for one another as community--and though it's methods are imperfect, we welcome any who would help us strive toward caring for one another--to putting their needs above ours--to all those who would see in friend and stranger the very image of God.


Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   autonomy   community   economics   faith   individualism   keynesian   kingdom   NPR  
Posted February 3, 2009
// 2 Comments

on cotton, peanuts and renaissance (or "a tale of two [southern] cities")

     
Click here to download:
on_cotton_peanuts_and_renaissa.zip (174 KB)

I was sitting in my car outside the grocery store last Monday listening to NPR when I heard a profile on the small town of Blakely, Georgia. Blakely has been at the center of concerns surrounding a salmonella outbreak from a factory in Blakely responsible for preparing peanut butter, paste, and other products. All Things Considered decided to interview the mayor of the small south Georgia town, Ric Hall. You can sense in the interview a palpable dissonance between rural America and Michele Norris' urban radio studio, particularly when she asks if the peanut features prominently in signs and public displays.

When Mayor Hall responds that there is, in fact, a peanut monument just outside of City Hall, it seems laughable--like something that would be noted in a travelogue of bizarre American landmarks. As I listened closer though, I realized that though I am every bit Georgian, I, too, was missing something in my dismissal of this lament from the rural South. Mayor Hall explains that the peanut was the crop that saved most of South Georgia. When the boll weevil was devastating cotton crops from Texas to South Carolina in the first half of the last century, the peanut became the saving grace of over half the agriculture of the South. So much so, that it merited a monument on the town square--a testament to the ingenuity of a people willing to diversify in the face of immense crisis.

The wonders of Wikipedia yield a comparable statue in Enterprise, Alabama. There, a statue stands large and Romanesque, as an everlasting witness to the boll weevil himself. Instead of building a monument to the cure, Enterprise celebrated the cause of the disease, because it forced farmers to diversify crops and, in so doing, brought tremendous agricultural prosperity to the city.

In Blakely the Peanut Corporation of America was shutting down, laying off the 50 or so workers who based their livelihood on the plant. Last week alone, over 100,000 men and women across America met similar fates. In the midst of recession, burgeoning unemployment and a shrinking GDP, the question might rightly be "What will our next monuments be built to?" Or, as the statue of Enterprise might suggest "Where will our ingenuity take us next?"

The sin of our times is believing that we've gone beyond repair--that things are so dire that they simply cannot be reconciled. The cotton crops in Alabama and South Georgia had weathered slavery, indentured servitude, sharecroppers, and finally industrialization. Still, a tiny non-native insect managed to destroy the livelihood of a few million Americans--but it didn't. Not only that, but the human spirit was such that it could recognize a plague of biblical proportions as a blessing--something to shake us out of our comfortability and force us to find ways to spur on creativity and innovation.

I don't know what the next monument in Blakely will be--it might be an automotive assembly robot, a wind turbine for renewable energy, or maybe a silicon chip to some aspect of technology. There is a great deal of attention being paid to the crisis of our time, and monuments remind us that this is neither the first nor the last time we have encountered such hardships. 

What we have seen in the greed and excess of our times exposes the shadow side of our ingenuity. The creative capacity God has given to humanity for the building up of the Beloved Community has been relegated to pursuing our own vices and comforts with no regard for neighbor. There is an American tendency to perceive this as a quest for the common good but we know it as the basic commerce policy of the Kingdom of God.

As we lose jobs and look for answers, watch 401(k)s crash and markets tumble, may we continue to build the Kingdom in intangible ways.

May our innovation lead to actions of sacred peace.

May our drive be directed only toward that which is good for the many, and not just the one.

May we embrace this crisis and erect monuments to it.

May it remind us that we are more than what we produce

that million dollar office renovations yield nothing to the Kingdom of God,
that we follow a Savior who had no place to lay his head
that the Kingdom comes not in earthen structures but in earthen vessels committed to a new vision of what humanity can be
that, in the midst of all manner of strife and chaos, we cannot help but hope.

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   AL   blakely   boll weevil   economy   enterprise   GA   kingdom   NPR   peanuts  
Posted February 2, 2009
// 1 Comment

on dinner parties and guest lists (or "guess who's coming to dinner?")

   
Click here to download:
on_dinner_parties_and_guest_li.zip (350 KB)

Thanks to the wonders of NPR's This I Believe series my commute to pick Jen up from work was spent hanging on every word from Jim Haynes Paris-by-way-of-Louisiana mouth.


 If you have time, you should read the whole story, but I'll give a quick-read. Jim is an ex-pat who has, for the last thirty years, dared to feed anyone who so chose to join him for dinner. Conservative estimates place his total dinner guests at over 100,000 people. He says simply, yet profoundly:

"People from all corners of the world come to break bread together, to meet, to talk, connect and often become friends. All ages, nationalities, races, professions gather here, and since there is no organized seating, the opportunity for mingling couldn't be better. I love the randomness. I believe in introducing people to people."

My first thought was how bad I wish Jen and I could grab a ticket to Paris, just to see the variety and complexity--to count ourselves as part of a great tradition of cultivating love for neighbor. I know--there's nothing about love in the quote above--he gets to that a bit later.

"Tolerance can lead to respect and, finally, to love."

The image of the open table is so captivating--so inviting--it makes me covet a spot at that table, with the full intention of knowing no-one, but being absolutely certain that would not be the case when the meal was over.

Jesus sat around a lot of tables, and while Jim Haynes isn't Jesus, he's hit upon an image of the Gospel that  the church and time forgot. The power of an open table--with no requirement of dress or class--merely the invitation to "come and dine."

When we took our second trip to Bulgaria last summer we were filling in for a team that had to cancel at the last minute. We threw back-to-school parties in orphanages, complete with pizza, junk food, soft drinks--all the stuff that causes obesity and tooth decay here, but is a rare treat there. We knew we needed to tell a bible story, but we couldn't decide. We eventually went with Jesus' story of the Great banquet in Luke's gospel. There's all sorts of hermeneutical layers to it, but it couldn't have been more simple.

The kids colored their die-cut construction paper selves, then, one-by-one, ran and glued them to a poster of an open table, with plenty of food and only Jesus and all the other dinner guests who had decided to sit at the table(see picture 2). You had to fight back tears as young and old, autistic and mentally ill, staff and residents, missionaries and suburbanites visioned themselves seated at God's great banquet. All had their fill, and each one enjoyed the company of the other.

I want to rediscover the art of the long meal.

I want the gospel to be as wide and ranging as an open invitation to Sunday dinner.

I want to sit at the table with anyone else who would join me.

I want every swallow of drink, every morsel savored to be a reminder of the communion God gave us in Christ and with one another.

I want every laugh uttered, every smile exchanged, every story told to breathe the silent blessing of God's abundant goodness.

God Is Good by Enter The Worship Circle  
(download)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bulgaria   kingdom   NPR  
Posted January 13, 2009
// 0 Comments