Posterous
Trey is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Dsc02016_thumb
 
soul - ache  - ideas, sounds and images between the already and the not-yet

on innocence (lost & found)

Many of the folks who read this know that we have been working through the process of in-state adoption for the last few months. We had our first visit with our prospective child yesterday. There are a hundred things I could say about this moment, but there was one theme that kept running through my head on a perpetual loop.


Without violating a whole lot of state rules, let's suffice it to say that the child in question is in state custody, which means he encountered some pretty rough things. What struck me is how amazingly innocent this kid was. Sure, the child is capable of any number of things--lying, stealing, not sharing, not listening, the list goes on. The die-hard theological sensibilities in me tell me that this child is a sinner and was born into it whether they wanted to be or not.

After all, I was raised to believe that "my sin was always before me" and the guilt of that thought alone was (and still is) enough to send me into the abyss of despair (which is somewhere past the Slough of Despond , I'm convinced). Any life occurrence that went anything other than how I'd planned it was instantly, subconsciously connected to sin, be it of omission or commission. 

Of course, then there's the matchless grace of Jesus (deeper than the mighty rolling sea...). This grace, I was told, makes all those filthy rags magically turn white. I am, per Paul and the witness of Scripture, a new creation--transformed as it were, from depraved sinner to redeemed saint.

In terms of the living of Christian life, it was painted that life is more or less a struggle between these two opposing forces, best represented in Luther's famous statement simul justus et peccator--"at the same time sinner and saint."

I freely admit, at the ripe old age of 30, I now tend to lean on the side of "grace for once and for all." My self-flagellating desires are gone--I have to embrace a Love that had been embracing me while I squalled about my prodigal nature. Which brings me back to this potential new addition to our family.

He did nothing to deserve the treatment he has yet endured. It is tempting to paint those responsible for his care as inhumane people who are somehow beyond redemption, but that misses the point. There are any number of factors that predisposed them to making bad situations worse, be it the endless cycle of poverty and abuse or the economic isolation of the rural South. More than that, if I am innocent, then I must confess under Christ, that they too, are innocent.

Most of us speak of innocence in virginal terms--something that cannot be regained once lost. All the while the story of redemption is born in every flower shooting forth in Spring, every child embraced, every life transformed by a grace that rejects all attempts to deny it's very existence.

To identify ourselves only, or indeed primarily, as "sinners saved by grace" is to only tell half of the story. 

To say that we are, 
that we have been, 
that we will perpetually be 
innocent. 

And that is very, very good news.

Innocent (American Idol Studio Version) by David Cook  
(download)

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted February 9, 2009
// 1 Comment

on the fallacy of the false dilemma (and how we all do it anyway)

For the last few weeks I've been teaching a class called Critical Thinking at one of Shorter's Adult Education campuses. It's an interdisciplinary class, so apparently I'm credentialed to teach it, and the modest amount of philosophy experience I've had seems to meet with the basic use of logic and forms.

There are a lot of things I've enjoyed about this class--it forces me to force other people to think (really think--like make-your-head-hurt-like-a-Dairy-Queen-induced-brain-freeze think.) It's allowed me to play devil's advocate A LOT--which is something I relish in the classroom. It's also forced me to consider logical fallacies that flow around us like the sea.

They are omnipresent--radiating from the speakers of televisions and talk radios, water-cooler banter and lunch-hour conversations. All around are arguments, that, albeit passionate and well-intentioned, do meet the standards of logic and are easily dismissed (including the one you're reading right now.)

In the last week or so, I have become particularly attuned to one such fallacy--so much so that I gave it an easter egg link in yesterday's blog, but as it has repeatedly resurfaced like a bobber with a trout on the line, I thought it merited its own post.

The fallacy of the false dilemma  is better known as the "either/or" fallacy. Simply put, it is an argument which claims only two options--for/against, black/white, pro/con--the list goes on ad infinitum. 

It turns out there are many reasons to believe these things are true. Dyads are common in nature and in science--where there ceases to be life, there is death, and so on. The problem occurs when an individual asserts that something can be one thing only, always. This suggests an implicit dichotomy where nothing else matters--only which side of the issue one has chosen.

And this effects everything. One can be either poor or rich, pro______ or against_________. 

On the heels of my take "on faith and economics" yesterday came word that Senator Tom Daschle was removing his name from consideration of a Cabinet appointment due to his failure to report and pay certain taxes as well as a lucrative side-income from speaking to various health lobbyists. One cannot, by common opinion, argue the cause of the poor and marginalized while taking measures to preserve a lifestyle of luxury.

On the faith side of the spectrum, much has been made of former President of National Association of Evangelicals Ted Haggard's untimely "fall from grace." The one-time crusader against rights for homosexuals hasrecently confessed to an innate attraction to men . Haggard has been affixed with the scarlet "H" of hypocrisy worn by Swaggart and Bakker, Ainsley and Alamo, and a thousand others before them.

I do not mean to dismiss these failures as inconsequential, but I would suggest that the false dilemma so quickly wielded in judgment is, as its name would suggest, a fallacy which we prize at our own peril.

Martin Luther famously apprised the human condition as "simul justus et peccator"--"at the same time, righteous and a sinner". For Luther, this paradox in which we live perpetually sinful-yet-grace-imbued righteous lives was a matter not of doing, but of being. The question was not tied to action but to essence. Human beings, for Luther, were, to stretch Heiko Oberman's biography of Luther a bit, perpetually between God and Devil. For Luther, this is where we live and move and have our being--between the sinful and the righteous.

Our political rhetoric seeks to stratify us by association with certain patterns of voting and belief. Red and Blue are the colors of the political palette and there is little room for shades of purple to dot the landscape.

The reason we know the fallacy of the false dilemma is because we live in the ether of the gray. 

U2 has a new album coming out, brashly titled "No Line on the Horizon" . They have chosen for the cover a photograph by the prestigious Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto from a collection entitled seascapes. After looking over the collection, I was somewhat surprised they chose Boden Sea over Sugimoto's Ligurian Sea, Saviore, 1982, pictured above. One shows an indistinct, fuzzy-but-still-there line between ocean and sky, but theLiguran Sea shows only a gray gradient--like a fog that blurs the blue-black water and the gray-white air.

There are all sorts of things that seduce us into false dilemmas, whether it's the theological inconsistencies of another ordained minister or the narrowing circle of acceptable belief within the Georgia Baptist Convention.  

To fall for the fallacy of the false dilemma is to reckon ourselves as "one or the other"--it means we are then, only, always sinner or only, always saint. 

It belies our God-given ability to think, create and adapt. 

It pigeonholes us into unnecessary categories that mechanize the gift of humanity.

It reduces our intricately woven selves into pull-cord marionettes.

But most of all, when we fall for the fallacy of the false dilemma (even this one), we risk missing the creative potential God has imbued us with.

We risk missing the joy of having our minds changed.

We risk missing out on celebrating a moment of Divine enlightenment with our neighbor.

We risk thinking that we've got things nailed down when we're still grasping at Mystery.

We risk exchanging the holy gift of wonder for the eroding sand of right-ness.

We risk gaining the whole world and losing our souls.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted February 4, 2009
// 1 Comment